Creators. Savva Yamshchikov. Part I

2013-09-12 06:38 AM | Sundries
Creators. Savva Yamshchikov. Part I In the traditional heading "Creators" "File Russian Federation" tells about our contemporaries made and doing everything not to self-interest for the sake of, and for enhancement of glory of the Fatherland, spiritual and material culture of Russia, protecting and preserving unity and integrity of the Russian state. Today we remember Savva Yamshchikov.

Two years ago to a loved child of the well-known restorer, the art critic, educator Savva Yamshchikov – department of promotion of art heritage of the State research institute of restoration – thirty years were executed. During department existence his employees returned a number of the forgotten names of remarkable Russian artists from a non-existence, restored hundreds pictures, carried out a set of exhibitions, each of which was an event in cultural life of the Soviet Union and Russia.

About Savva Yamshchikov, how it was worked with him and as is without him, about exhibitions in the house on Burdenko Street the correspondent of “File Russian Federation” Lyudmila Sapozhnikova is told by the manager of department, the honored worker of culture of the Russian Federation, artist-restorer Nina of ZAYTsEVA, the artist-restorer of the highest category Vitaly of KUZYuBERDIN, art critic Marfa of YaMShchIKOVA.

Lyudmila Sapozhnikova: With what work of department of exhibitions of Institute of restoration began, for what purpose it was created?
  Nina Zaytseva. 
Nina Zaytseva: Department of promotion of art heritage – such name was given it initially – there are more than 30 years, since June 1, 1981 when the Minister of Culture of the USSR P. N. Demichev signed the order on its creation. The name was given it in the spirit of that time – to remember at least department of promotion and propaganda of the Central Committee of CPSU and in L.N. Tolstoy’s State museum excursion department carried the same name – “promotion department”.

Vitaly Kuzyuberdin: Department created Saveli Yamshchikov and Sergey Golushkin. On them it also kept, as on pillars. Move away one – and the department won’t be. Such tandem peculiar: Golushkin went to business trip, found something interesting – and Coachmen from his giving “untwisted” a find. Saveli had a tremendous organizing talent, huge human charm: the person his first time sees, in few minutes – everything, they are the best friends! He then was the member of art criticism section of the Union of artists, received a workshop in Vsevolozhsk the lane, “bunker” it called.And there who only wasn’t – from tsekovsky bonzes to actors. These its contacts – acquaintances, friends, communication with them – helped with work. In total and it was created – exhibitions prepared, catalogs became. Yamshchikov needed to bring together people only: this works in publishing house, this – in showroom … Saveli as on whales, on the friends I stood.

In the seventies newspapers dazzled with materials about opening of museum relics. And here – restoration! It was surprising. Same Chestnyakov: rags any – and suddenly pictures turn out. And when there took place a loud exhibition of Old Russian painting on Kuznetsk to the bridge – the turn on it along all street stood.

Exhibitions became on Yamshchikov’s pressure, on the personal relations, a huge number of friends. Preparation of such action is and correspondence with museums, both photos, and lists of works, contracts, permissions, coordination. The huge volume of the work, not each organization in power – and the subject was demanded. Here on this wave the idea of creation of department of exhibitions also was born. It and still informal, working name of our department.

Hp: And why to Institute of restoration came? Same at that time not the only restoration organization was, to take the same center of Grabarya – with it Coachmen and Golushkin too actively interacted. I know that in department there are also the employees who have come from “Grabarey” …
  Vitaly Kuzyuberdin. 
Century. To. : To restoration Institute Yamshchikov and Golushkin always had a special relation – there was a wish know scientific base of institute and our practical. Because there production and still because All-Union central research laboratory of preservation and restoration of museum and art values (VTsNILKR) as the restoration Institute first was called, it is more solid more opportunities for work. The center of Grabarya is too serious restoration firm, even now, after a last year’s fire, it didn’t lose the status – but there it would be more difficult to keep department “sovereignty”.lko wasn’t – from tsekovsky bonzes to actors. These its contacts – acquaintances, friends, communication with them – helped with work. In total and it was created – exhibitions prepared, catalogs became. Yamshchikov needed to bring together people only: this works in publishing house, this – in showroom … Saveli as on whales, on the friends I stood.

In the seventies newspapers dazzled with materials about opening of museum relics. And here – restoration! It was surprising. Same Chestnyakov: rags any – and suddenly pictures turn out. And when there took place a loud exhibition of Old Russian painting on Kuznetsk to the bridge – the turn on it along all street stood.

Exhibitions became on Yamshchikov’s pressure, on the personal relations, a huge number of friends. Preparation of such action is and correspondence with museums, both photos, and lists of works, contracts, permissions, coordination. The huge volume of the work, not each organization in power – and the subject was demanded. Here on this wave the idea of creation of department of exhibitions also was born. It and still informal, working name of our department.

Hp: And why to Institute of restoration came? Same at that time not the only restoration organization was, to take the same center of Grabarya – with it Coachmen and Golushkin too actively interacted. I know that in department there are also the employees who have come from “Grabarey” …
  Vitaly Kuzyuberdin. 
Century. To. : To restoration Institute Yamshchikov and Golushkin always had a special relation – there was a wish know scientific base of institute and our practical. Because there production and still because All-Union central research laboratory of preservation and restoration of museum and art values (VTsNILKR) as the restoration Institute first was called, it is more solid more opportunities for work. The center of Grabarya is too serious restoration firm, even now, after a last year’s fire, it didn’t lose the status – but there it would be more difficult to keep department “sovereignty”.And there who only wasn’t – from tsekovsky bonzes to actors. These its contacts – acquaintances, friends, communication with them – helped with work. In total and it was created – exhibitions prepared, catalogs became. Yamshchikov needed to bring together people only: this works in publishing house, this – in showroom … Saveli as on whales, on the friends I stood.

In the seventies newspapers dazzled with materials about opening of museum relics. And here – restoration! It was surprising. Same Chestnyakov: rags any – and suddenly pictures turn out. And when there took place a loud exhibition of Old Russian painting on Kuznetsk to the bridge – the turn on it along all street stood.

Exhibitions became on Yamshchikov’s pressure, on the personal relations, a huge number of friends. Preparation of such action is and correspondence with museums, both photos, and lists of works, contracts, permissions, coordination. The huge volume of the work, not each organization in power – and the subject was demanded. Here on this wave the idea of creation of department of exhibitions also was born. It and still informal, working name of our department.

Hp: And why to Institute of restoration came? Same at that time not the only restoration organization was, to take the same center of Grabarya – with it Coachmen and Golushkin too actively interacted. I know that in department there are also the employees who have come from “Grabarey” …
  Vitaly Kuzyuberdin. 
Century. To. : To restoration Institute Yamshchikov and Golushkin always had a special relation – there was a wish know scientific base of institute and our practical. Because there production and still because All-Union central research laboratory of preservation and restoration of museum and art values (VTsNILKR) as the restoration Institute first was called, it is more solid more opportunities for work. The center of Grabarya is too serious restoration firm, even now, after a last year’s fire, it didn’t lose the status – but there it would be more difficult to keep department “sovereignty”.lko wasn’t – from tsekovsky bonzes to actors. These its contacts – acquaintances, friends, communication with them – helped with work. In total and it was created – exhibitions prepared, catalogs became. Yamshchikov needed to bring together people only: this works in publishing house, this – in showroom … Saveli as on whales, on the friends I stood.

In the seventies newspapers dazzled with materials about opening of museum relics. And here – restoration! It was surprising. Same Chestnyakov: rags any – and suddenly pictures turn out. And when there took place a loud exhibition of Old Russian painting on Kuznetsk to the bridge – the turn on it along all street stood.

Exhibitions became on Yamshchikov’s pressure, on the personal relations, a huge number of friends. Preparation of such action is and correspondence with museums, both photos, and lists of works, contracts, permissions, coordination. The huge volume of the work, not each organization in power – and the subject was demanded. Here on this wave the idea of creation of department of exhibitions also was born. It and still informal, working name of our department.

Hp: And why to Institute of restoration came? Same at that time not the only restoration organization was, to take the same center of Grabarya – with it Coachmen and Golushkin too actively interacted. I know that in department there are also the employees who have come from “Grabarey” …
  Vitaly Kuzyuberdin. 
Century. To. : To restoration Institute Yamshchikov and Golushkin always had a special relation – there was a wish know scientific base of institute and our practical. Because there production and still because All-Union central research laboratory of preservation and restoration of museum and art values (VTsNILKR) as the restoration Institute first was called, it is more solid more opportunities for work. The center of Grabarya is too serious restoration firm, even now, after a last year’s fire, it didn’t lose the status – but there it would be more difficult to keep department “sovereignty”.And there who only wasn’t – from tsekovsky bonzes to actors. These its contacts – acquaintances, friends, communication with them – helped with work. In total and it was created – exhibitions prepared, catalogs became. Yamshchikov needed to bring together people only: this works in publishing house, this – in showroom … Saveli as on whales, on the friends I stood.

In the seventies newspapers dazzled with materials about opening of museum relics. And here – restoration! It was surprising. Same Chestnyakov: rags any – and suddenly pictures turn out. And when there took place a loud exhibition of Old Russian painting on Kuznetsk to the bridge – the turn on it along all street stood.

Exhibitions became on Yamshchikov’s pressure, on the personal relations, a huge number of friends. Preparation of such action is and correspondence with museums, both photos, and lists of works, contracts, permissions, coordination. The huge volume of the work, not each organization in power – and the subject was demanded. Here on this wave the idea of creation of department of exhibitions also was born. It and still informal, working name of our department.

Hp: And why to Institute of restoration came? Same at that time not the only restoration organization was, to take the same center of Grabarya – with it Coachmen and Golushkin too actively interacted. I know that in department there are also the employees who have come from “Grabarey” …
  Vitaly Kuzyuberdin. 
Century. To. : To restoration Institute Yamshchikov and Golushkin always had a special relation – there was a wish know scientific base of institute and our practical. Because there production and still because All-Union central research laboratory of preservation and restoration of museum and art values (VTsNILKR) as the restoration Institute first was called, it is more solid more opportunities for work. The center of Grabarya is too serious restoration firm, even now, after a last year’s fire, it didn’t lose the status – but there it would be more difficult to keep department “sovereignty”.lko wasn’t – from tsekovsky bonzes to actors. These its contacts – acquaintances, friends, communication with them – helped with work. In total and it was created – exhibitions prepared, catalogs became. Yamshchikov needed to bring together people only: this works in publishing house, this – in showroom … Saveli as on whales, on the friends I stood.

In the seventies newspapers dazzled with materials about opening of museum relics. And here – restoration! It was surprising. Same Chestnyakov: rags any – and suddenly pictures turn out. And when there took place a loud exhibition of Old Russian painting on Kuznetsk to the bridge – the turn on it along all street stood.

Exhibitions became on Yamshchikov’s pressure, on the personal relations, a huge number of friends. Preparation of such action is and correspondence with museums, both photos, and lists of works, contracts, permissions, coordination. The huge volume of the work, not each organization in power – and the subject was demanded. Here on this wave the idea of creation of department of exhibitions also was born. It and still informal, working name of our department.

Hp: And why to Institute of restoration came? Same at that time not the only restoration organization was, to take the same center of Grabarya – with it Coachmen and Golushkin too actively interacted. I know that in department there are also the employees who have come from “Grabarey” …
  Vitaly Kuzyuberdin. 
Century. To. : To restoration Institute Yamshchikov and Golushkin always had a special relation – there was a wish know scientific base of institute and our practical. Because there production and still because All-Union central research laboratory of preservation and restoration of museum and art values (VTsNILKR) as the restoration Institute first was called, it is more solid more opportunities for work. The center of Grabarya is too serious restoration firm, even now, after a last year’s fire, it didn’t lose the status – but there it would be more difficult to keep department “sovereignty”.And there who only wasn’t – from tsekovsky bonzes to actors. These its contacts – acquaintances, friends, communication with them – helped with work. In total and it was created – exhibitions prepared, catalogs became. Yamshchikov needed to bring together people only: this works in publishing house, this – in showroom … Saveli as on whales, on the friends I stood.

In the seventies newspapers dazzled with materials about opening of museum relics. And here – restoration! It was surprising. Same Chestnyakov: rags any – and suddenly pictures turn out. And when there took place a loud exhibition of Old Russian painting on Kuznetsk to the bridge – the turn on it along all street stood.

Exhibitions became on Yamshchikov’s pressure, on the personal relations, a huge number of friends. Preparation of such action is and correspondence with museums, both photos, and lists of works, contracts, permissions, coordination. The huge volume of the work, not each organization in power – and the subject was demanded. Here on this wave the idea of creation of department of exhibitions also was born. It and still informal, working name of our department.

Hp: And why to Institute of restoration came? Same at that time not the only restoration organization was, to take the same center of Grabarya – with it Coachmen and Golushkin too actively interacted. I know that in department there are also the employees who have come from “Grabarey” …
  Vitaly Kuzyuberdin. 

Century. To. : To restoration Institute Yamshchikov and Golushkin always had a special relation – there was a wish know scientific base of institute and our practical. Because there production and still because All-Union central research laboratory of preservation and restoration of museum and art values (VTsNILKR) as the restoration Institute first was called, it is more solid more opportunities for work. The center of Grabarya is too serious restoration firm, even now, after a last year’s fire, it didn’t lose the status – but there it would be more difficult to keep department “sovereignty”.


Source article
back

See more

Public Chamber of the Moscow headquarters established an Election Observation

"Any, even minor violations will be recorded and passed on to law enforcement agencies" - promised the deputy chairman of the ETA, the chief…

Read more

In the south-east of Ukraine UN counted 2,593 dead

At the same time representatives of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights stated that the actual losses are likely to be much higher.

Read more

UN accused the Ukrainian military in civilian deaths

International experts have caught the official Kiev to outright lies regarding the methods of warfare.

Read more
In other sections

The woman jumped out the window with her daughter in her arms

According to preliminary data, she had severe depression

Read more

In Magadan truck rammed a passenger plane

All the passengers were not injured

Read more

Putin had to say about Ukraine, even among the mammoths

Putin had to say about Ukraine, even among the mammoths The President met with the Day of Knowledge Yakut students

Read more

Why only Ahmed, but not Ivan?

Why only Ahmed, but not Ivan? Conflict Mezhuyev Israel and "Hamas" today by the same Western media covered much more objective than the war in the south-east of Ukraine,…

Read more

Sergei Stepashin, a former prime minister of Russia: "We Mahmoud Abbas drew an analogy between Donetsk, Lugansk and the Gaza Strip"

Sergei Stepashin, a former prime minister of Russia: "We Mahmoud Abbas drew an analogy between Donetsk, Lugansk and the Gaza Strip" This was a well-known politician who is on a visit to Palestine, said on Radio "KP"

Read more